A creditor with a Russian or other CIS court judgment may try to reach property in the United States. Receiving a U.S. recognition action does not mean the foreign judgment is already enforceable against your assets. It does mean you need a prompt response based on the law of the court hearing the claim. Arkady Bukh Law Firm represents clients seeking to defend against foreign judgment enforcement and related cross-border disputes.
The most useful starting point is the U.S. filing itself. Counsel needs to identify the requested relief, response deadline and legal procedure before choosing a defense. A recognition action, a bankruptcy matter and a request for interim relief can raise different issues.
How foreign judgment recognition works
State law often governs recognition of foreign-country money judgments. New York’s CPLR Article 53 and Florida’s foreign judgment recognition statutes provide frameworks with grounds for refusing recognition. The applicable rules distinguish mandatory grounds from grounds on which a court has discretion.
Questions may include the foreign court’s jurisdiction, the fairness of the relevant procedures, notice and an opportunity to defend, fraud affecting the proceeding, or a sufficiently serious public policy conflict. A defense must fit the governing law and the record. A different legal system or an unfavorable result alone does not establish a defense.
Counsel must also evaluate whether the judgment qualifies for the procedure the creditor has chosen. For example, uncertainty about the relief actually awarded can require close examination of the foreign court’s orders and subsequent procedural history.
What the Zhanna Matsenko matter illustrates
Arkady Bukh Law Firm’s published account reports that a Miami-Dade court refused recognition and enforcement of a Russian decision imposing subsidiary liability on Zhanna Matsenko for a company’s debts. The firm’s account describes issues involving the asserted basis for personal liability and the absence of a final determination of the amount claimed.
The practical lesson is to examine the creditor’s legal and evidentiary foundation in detail. The account does not establish a general exemption for Russian judgments or resolve another person’s case. Prior results depend on their particular facts and do not guarantee a similar outcome.
For a client facing a comparable claim, the relevant work includes examining how liability was imposed, what the court finally decided and whether the materials presented in the United States accurately describe that record.
Review the foreign proceedings as well as the U.S. claim
The documents usually need to tell a complete procedural story. We look for the originating claim, evidence of service, substantive decisions, appellate rulings and records identifying the amount sought. Certified translations may be needed, and the meaning of foreign procedural terms may require explanation.
The client’s participation matters too. A statement that the case proceeded without notice should be checked against service records, appearances and communications with foreign counsel. Addressing difficult facts early is more useful than discovering them in the creditor’s reply.
Where foreign legal issues require specialist input, U.S. litigation strategy can be coordinated with counsel qualified in that jurisdiction. The goal is a clear presentation of the record and the defenses available in the U.S. forum.
Protect your position before enforcement advances
Preserve the full court record and any correspondence from the creditor. Tell counsel about related litigation, settlements, guarantees and existing restraints. Do not assume a pending foreign appeal automatically stops the U.S. case; the available response or stay request needs separate analysis.
Asset planning must remain lawful. Moving property after a claim arises can create additional disputes and undermine a defense. Ask counsel about applicable orders and obligations before acting.
Questions about Russian and CIS judgments
Does the absence of a bilateral treaty prevent enforcement
Do not assume it does. Recognition can be available under applicable U.S. law without a bilateral judgment enforcement treaty. The analysis should address the governing statute and the actual judgment.
Can a U.S. court retry the entire foreign case
A recognition proceeding usually focuses on the legal requirements for recognition and the defenses the governing law permits. It is not a general opportunity to relitigate every factual disagreement from the foreign lawsuit.
Request a foreign judgment defense review
Email info@arkadybukhlawfirm.com with the U.S. court, filing date and response deadline. Arkady Bukh Law Firm can discuss a focused review of the recognition claim, available objections and the evidence needed to support your position.
Related legal services
Federal White Collar Criminal Defense Lawyer in New York and Miami